Correct Answer: B) unleavened bread

Explanation

The question is asking about the timing of the Last Supper that Jesus had with his disciples. According to the options provided, the Last Supper was either on the first day of the passion week, unleavened bread, Sabbath, atonement, or week.

The correct option is B, unleavened bread. The Last Supper took place during the Jewish festival of Passover, which included the Feast of Unleavened Bread. During this feast, the Jews were required to eat bread without yeast, also known as unleavened bread. The Last Supper was in fact a Passover meal, where Jesus gave his disciples bread and wine as symbols of his body and blood.

It is important to note that the Last Supper, which is also known as the Lord's Supper or Communion, is a significant event in Christianity. Christians often commemorate the Last Supper during Holy Week, which is the week leading up to Easter Sunday.

In conclusion, the Last Supper Jesus had with his disciples was on the first day of the Feast of Unleavened Bread, which was part of the Passover festival. This event is remembered by Christians as the institution of the Lord's Supper or Communion.

Correct Answer: A) Bishop Ajayi Crowther

Explanation

The question is asking who translated the English Bible into the Yoruba language. The options are Bishop Ajayi Crowther, Mary Slessor, Evangelist Ayo Babalola, Evangelist Moses Orlmolade, and Bishop Lennon.

The correct answer is Bishop Ajayi Crowther. He was a Yoruba man who was kidnapped as a slave and later became a bishop in the Anglican Church. He was well-educated and was able to translate the Bible into the Yoruba language. He also translated the Bible into other Nigerian languages such as Igbo and Nupe.

It is important to note that there were other missionaries and individuals who contributed to Bible translation in Nigeria, but Bishop Ajayi Crowther is specifically known for his work in translating the Bible into the Yoruba language.

In summary, the person who translated the English Bible into the Yoruba language was Bishop Ajayi Crowther.

Correct Answer: D) Abimelech

Explanation

In the Bible, Abimelech was the son of Gideon (also known as Jerubbaal) by his Shechemite concubine. He is mentioned in the Book of Judges, Chapter 9. Abimelech killed 70 of his half-brothers, all sons of Gideon, upon one stone in an attempt to establish himself as the ruler of Israel. He wanted to eliminate any potential competition for the leadership. However, Jotham, the youngest brother, managed to escape the massacre. Abimelech's actions were driven by ambition and a desire for power.

Correct Answer: D) Herod

Explanation

This question is asking about a reference to a fox in the Bible. The question is asking who the fox is referring to. The correct answer is option D, which is Herod.

In the Bible, Jesus referred to Herod as a fox in Luke 13:32. This was when some Pharisees warned Jesus that Herod wanted to kill Him. Jesus replied, Go and tell that fox, behold, I cast out devils ...

It is important to note that in the Bible, animals are often used to represent people. In this case, the term fox was used to describe Herod, who was known for his sly and cunning nature.

By answering this question correctly, it shows that you have a good understanding of the Bible and its use of symbolism. It is important to read the Bible regularly to gain a deeper understanding of its teachings

Correct Answer: A) they did not faithfully disclose the amount of the proceeds of the land they sold

Explanation

The question is asking about the offence committed by Ananias and Sapphira. Ananias and Sapphira were a married couple who were members of the early Christian community in Jerusalem. According to the Bible, they sold a piece of property but only gave a portion of the proceeds to the apostles, keeping some for themselves.

The correct option is A, which states that they did not faithfully disclose the amount of the proceeds of the land they sold. This means that they lied about the amount of money they received from the sale of their property.

This offence was considered serious because it was a betrayal of the trust of the community and a lie to the Holy Spirit. As a result, both Ananias and Sapphira were struck dead by God.

It is important to note that lying and deceit are considered serious sins in Christianity, and honesty and integrity are highly valued virtues. Christians are called to live a life of truthfulness and to always speak the truth.

In summary, the offence of Ananias and Sapphira was that they lied about the amount of money they received from the sale of their property. This was considered a serious sin in Christianity, and they were both struck dead by God.

Correct Answer: D) Jericho

Explanation

This question is asking about the case of Joshua where he was instructed to take off his shoes because the place he stood was holy. The correct answer is option D, Jericho.

In the book of Joshua, God commanded Joshua to take off his shoes because he was standing on holy ground. This happened at Jericho when Joshua was preparing to lead the Israelites into battle. God instructed Joshua to march around the city of Jericho once a day for six days and on the seventh day, to march around the city seven times. After the seventh time, the Israelites were to shout and the walls of Jericho would fall down.

It is important to note that the act of taking off one's shoes is a sign of respect and humility before God. It signifies that the place where one stands is holy and should be treated with reverence. This practice is also seen in the story of Moses and the burning bush, where he was told to take off his sandals because he was standing on holy ground.

In summary, the case of Joshua where he was instructed to take off his shoes because the place he stood was holy happened at Jericho. It was a sign of respect and humility before God, and similar instructions were also given to Moses at the burning bush.

Correct Answer: A) bereaved of the child

Explanation

The question is asking about a conversation between Nathan and David. Nathan tells David that God will show him mercy, but something else will happen too. The options list different things that could happen. The correct option is option A, which says that David will be bereaved of the child. This means that the child will die.

To better understand this question, we need to know who Nathan and David are. Nathan was a prophet in the Old Testament, and David was a king of Israel. The conversation being referred to in this question happened after David committed a grave sin with Bathsheba, another man's wife. Nathan confronted David about his sin, and in response, David repented and asked for God's forgiveness.

In the conversation referred to in the question, Nathan tells David that God will show him mercy, but that there will still be consequences for his sin. The consequence mentioned in the correct option, option A, is that David will lose his child. This punishment is a result of David's sin, but it is also an act of mercy from God, as it could have been much worse.

In summary, the correct option for this question is option A, which says that David will be bereaved of the child. This refers to the consequence of David's sin, which was losing his child. Nathan and David are important figures in the Old Testament, and this question relates to a conversation they had after David sinned with Bathsheba.

Correct Answer: C) pruned

Explanation

In the Bible, there is a story about Jesus teaching his followers using the metaphor of a vine and its branches. He said that those branches which bear fruits will be subjected to a certain process. This process is what the question is asking about. The question wants to know what will happen to the branches that bear fruits according to Jesus' teaching about the true vine.

The options given are A, B, C, D.Option A says the branches will be cultivated, option B says they will be grafted, option C says they will be pruned, option D says they will be pegged. To answer the question correctly, we need to choose the option that best describes the process that will happen to the branches that bear fruits.

The correct answer to this question is option C, which says that the branches that bear fruits will be pruned. Pruning is a process of cutting off some parts of a plant to encourage healthy growth and more fruit production. In the context of the story about the true vine, this means that those who follow Jesus and bear fruit will go through a process of refinement and purification to become more fruitful and effective in their service to God.

In summary, the question is asking about what will happen to the branches that bear fruits according to Jesus' teaching about the true vine. The correct answer is that those branches will be pruned. This means that those who follow Jesus and bear fruit will go through a process of refinement and purification to become more fruitful and effective in their service to God.

Correct Answer: D) lame

Explanation

In the Bible, there is a story about a man who was healed at the Beautiful Gate. The question is asking which of the following conditions the man had before he was healed. The options are crippled, blind, demonic, and lame.

To answer this question, we need to know what each of these conditions means. Crippled means having a physical disability that prevents normal movement or control of the body. Blind means unable to see. Leprous means having a skin disease that causes sores and scabs. Demonic means being possessed by an evil spirit. Finally, lame means unable to walk properly due to injury or disease.

Based on this information, we can determine that the correct answer is option D, which is lame. This means that the man was unable to walk properly before he was healed at the Beautiful Gate.

It's important to note that this story is found in the book of Acts in the New Testament of the Bible. It is a powerful example of the healing power of Jesus and the faith of the early Christian community.

To learn more about this story and other stories in the Bible, please read the relevant sections of the recommended textbooks.

Correct Answer: D) Christians should be encouraged to work

Explanation

This Christian Religious Knowledge question is asking about the meaning of the charge that he who does not work should not eat. The options given are A, B, C, D,

Option A suggests that Christians must not give food to people to eat, which is incorrect. As Christians, we are called to love and care for our neighbors, and this includes providing food for those in need.

Option B suggests that Christians must give food to working people only, which is also incorrect. While it is important to encourage and support hard work, Christians should not withhold food from those who are not currently employed.

Option C suggests that Christians should be taught to walk, which is unrelated to the question. This option can be ignored.

Option D is the correct answer. The charge that he who does not work should not eat is a biblical principle that encourages Christians to be productive and contribute to society. It does not mean that Christians should withhold food from those who are currently unable to work, but rather that able-bodied individuals should strive to work and be self-sufficient.

In summary, the correct answer to this question is option D, which suggests that Christians should be encouraged to work and be productive members of society while still caring for those in need.