Correct Answer: B. shift of the supply curve to the left or to the right

Correct Answer: B. Israel

Correct Answer: D. maximum

Correct Answer: A) output may be increased by changing all factors by the same proportion

Explanation

In this Economics question, we are being asked to identify which statement is not applicable in the short run. The options given are Option A: output may be increased by changing all factors by the same proportion, Option B: diminishing returns, Option C: there are sunk costs, and Option D: the total cost curve is the same as the total variable cost curve.

The correct answer is Option A: output may be increased by changing all factors by the same proportion. This statement is not applicable in the short run because in the short run, at least one factor of production is fixed, which means it cannot be changed. Therefore, output cannot be increased by changing all factors by the same proportion.

Diminishing returns, Option B, is applicable in the short run. This refers to the fact that as more of a variable input is added to a fixed input, the marginal product of the variable input will eventually decrease.

Option C, sunk costs, is also applicable in the short run. Sunk costs are costs that have already been incurred and cannot be recovered, regardless of the decision that is made.

Option D, the total cost curve being the same as the total variable cost curve, is applicable in the short run. This is because in the short run, at least one factor of production is fixed and therefore the total cost curve cannot be the same as the total variable cost curve.

In summary, the statement that is not applicable in the short run is Option A, and this is because at least one factor of production is fixed in the short run and therefore output cannot be increased by changing all factors by the same proportion.

Correct Answer: C) ethylpropanoate

Correct Answer: B. seeds

Explanation

Investigations into the activities of Chief Haladu Ade-Amaka are already in progress when Ogeyi goes to the police on account of her friend Aloho. Her story helps the police to wrap up their investigations and prefer charges against Chief and five others, including Ochuole, at Wasa High Court of Justice presided over by Judge.

It appears that only a fraction of the Minister's sins against the state and some people is known. According to Judge, For all the atrocities you must have perpetrated in this country under the cover of Minister, which have not been detected, I say nothing. Chief then faces four counts of embezzlement, involving 1.2 billion naira and 5.8 million naira (two counts); dealing in cocaine and corrupting a public officer.

Prosecution Counsel clearly outlines the role of the police in their investigation and what makes each accused person culpable. Inspector Inaku's evidence is clear and concise. What triggers police investigation is set down as Miss Ogeyi Ogar and the Jacassan Flash of 21st June, 1997. Following the newspaper report, the inspector goes to the Ministry and bribes Mr. Ayo to get access to official documents. By the inspector's own admission, Mr. Ayo does not ask for a bribe; rather, the Clerical Officer promised to cooperate after I enticed him with the sum of two thousand naira. This show of zeal is wrong. The law seems to be that both the giver and the receiver of a bribe are criminals. One would expect; then, that the court reprimand or even sentence inspector I naku once Mr. Ayo goes in for five years.

In her evidence, Ogeyi clearly tells Aloho's story and firmly incriminates Chief. Her reason for going to the police is consistent with her love for her late friend; failing to persuade Aloha not to abort the pregnancy, she was moved to go to the police to relate the story. However, Chief lies on oath, alleging that the cocaine had been put there to incriminated him. In the end, the court does not believe him and his breaking down avails him nothing. Of the two, Ogeyi is found credible by the court.

Both counsels do their work to the best of their abilities. Prosecution Counsel notes and draws attention to Defence Counsel's cleverly weaving the evidence of the prosecution to confuse this honourable court. He draws the court's attention to the relevant flaws in the case of the defence and leaves the rest to the judge and the jury. The judge sums up succinctly and his guiding of the jury is balanced.

On the whole, the proceedings go well and the verdict arising from the evidence appears to be satisfactory.

Correct Answer: A. disrespected the house of God

Correct Answer: A. Gills, streamlined bodies and lateral lines

Correct Answer: A. God can choose women as leaders